RainandSpence wrote: ↑2 years ago
I agree that only sexuals should not identify as little's.
But to say they are BeDeeSeM child abusers is just extremely uneducated.
Please actually read what you respond to. I said:
“They are roleplayers, scene players, diaper fetishists, and/or a part of the BeDeeSeM interest of relative relations
fantasy or
mock child abuse.”
Fantasy is not reality. Mock meaning mimicking, as if it were real while it is still yet not real.
Actually BeDeeSeM is not the desire to actually seek out something like relative relations or take advantage of children. It’s about 2+ grown adults engaging in legal, intimate adult activities by exploring fantasy through roleplay, mimicking and mocking scenes that are not a reflection of their reality.
Of course, even ageplay isn’t the fantasy of having sex with a child.
And I hate to break it to you but, yes, plenty of people do genuinely have fantasies of legitimate relative relations and child abuse. I’ve met a few of these people. Occasionally, some people into true child abuse fantasies even register and post here because they misunderstand this community.
Otherwise, yeah, sorry, if closing your eyes and pretending your partner “really is an actual” X year old child and that you’re really their parent who’s taking actual advantage of them and their immaturity while you’re having sex with them then you’re having child abuse and relative relations fantasies that are beyond BeDeeSeM acceptability. I’ve seen self-identifying pedos in our community say this is how they act out their desires without “offending”. Literally closing their eyes and pretending they’re with a child. That, that is not BeDeeSeM, that is not CGL, and that is not of some generalized, legal, or ethical “sex community”.
RainandSpence wrote: ↑2 years ago
I can inform you that the sex community doesn't look down on this type of behavior but will not accept it under any circumstance.
Okay, so, the sex community, whatever that is because most people in the world have or desire sex and I’d hardly say that’s a community, doesn’t look down on relative relations or child abuse but also doesn’t accept it in any way. This does not make sense. Not accepting it would be looking down upon it. The desire to seek out actual relative relations and/or actual child abuse should absolutely be looked down upon. Whatever though.
RainandSpence wrote: ↑2 years ago
The Sex Community is self-governing, these types of role-plays are accepted like Mommy and Daddy little boy and little girl, Age play. Anything like child involvement, relative relations, forced encounters, and non-consensual are completely outlawed and if someone is to discuss that they are banned and shunned from the community. They're most likely put on a directory so they cannot join other communities based around that subject or anything relating to physically intimate activities.
Because of this it has created and promoted Healthy Mind States and healthy physically intimate activity.
So, you’re a
leader of your local whatever community but you’re not confidently sure how a person who breeches these communal laws are documented, or perhaps even
if they are documented, to keep them from further engaging in other groups?
Uh huh.
You might consider that I’m also a community leader. I’ve been a part of the CGL community for close to 20 years now. I’ve been a member of the BeDeeSeM community for nearly just as long. I’ve been an online CGL community leader for over 6 years. You don’t need to educate me from the ground up. I’m not a freshly turned 18 year old newbie dabbling in whatever the hell the
sex community is.
Okay! Thanks for your less than insightful TED Talk. I think I’m going to pass on the next one.