- 4 years ago
#54336
Discussing the difference between ABs and DLs
Traditionally, AB and Regression are seen as paraphilias. We mean, even Wikipedia categorizes it as such. However, as the community continues to grow, we feel that it is no longer appropriate to think of our activities and tendencies as adult interests.
Diapers are an essential part of regression for many members in the community, including ourselves. We choose to make them part of our daily life even. How is attraction to an object, such as diapers, equate to a personality trait?
Adult Pacifiers have grown in popularity. Why isn't there a term for this? Adult Baby / diaper wearer / Pacifier Lover. That doesn't make sense! You don't need to be a Little to have attractions towards items linked to regression. Liking diapers or having physically intimate attraction to them isn't the same as wearing them as a choice to reflect your inner Little self.
We're not trying to say that diapers shouldn't be physically intimate - we understand that using diapers in physically intimate situations is commonplace among Regressors. What we're trying to say is that diaper wearer is a term that needs to be revisited to better represent the shape that the community has taken.
And we are suggesting to move away of being so diaper-centric. Bio-babies aren't defined by diapers, and Adult Babies shouldn't either. There's so much more to being a Little and a Regressor than wearing X clothes and participating in Y trends.
What do you think?
Traditionally, AB and Regression are seen as paraphilias. We mean, even Wikipedia categorizes it as such. However, as the community continues to grow, we feel that it is no longer appropriate to think of our activities and tendencies as adult interests.
Diapers are an essential part of regression for many members in the community, including ourselves. We choose to make them part of our daily life even. How is attraction to an object, such as diapers, equate to a personality trait?
Adult Pacifiers have grown in popularity. Why isn't there a term for this? Adult Baby / diaper wearer / Pacifier Lover. That doesn't make sense! You don't need to be a Little to have attractions towards items linked to regression. Liking diapers or having physically intimate attraction to them isn't the same as wearing them as a choice to reflect your inner Little self.
We're not trying to say that diapers shouldn't be physically intimate - we understand that using diapers in physically intimate situations is commonplace among Regressors. What we're trying to say is that diaper wearer is a term that needs to be revisited to better represent the shape that the community has taken.
And we are suggesting to move away of being so diaper-centric. Bio-babies aren't defined by diapers, and Adult Babies shouldn't either. There's so much more to being a Little and a Regressor than wearing X clothes and participating in Y trends.
What do you think?