Is it possible for someone to be in a CGL relationship without it being related to BeDeeSeM?
Posted: |November 14th, 2018|, 7:18 am
A biological parent/child relationship has nothing to do with traditional BeDeeSeM despite the parent being seen as authoritative over the child. The parent is not necessarily dominant, but is simply in a position of welfare over the child, who is seen as simply immature and not being capable of taking care of their full needs, growth, and development. CGL traditionally mimics a parent/child relationship to some degree but among unrelated adults, adding in it's own version of romance and possibly sexuality.
Could that mean that it's possible that two biological adults could have a healthy, functional Caregiver/little relationship together and not actually be actively engaging in BeDeeSeM (primarily Dom/sub roles or clear Dominance/submission)? What if both parties consider themselves to be asexual/nonsexual and do not engage in activities such as "punishment" but do individually engage in regression and partner parenting? What's your personal opinion? Can you see a different viewpoint than your own that could possibly make sense and also be "right"?
Could that mean that it's possible that two biological adults could have a healthy, functional Caregiver/little relationship together and not actually be actively engaging in BeDeeSeM (primarily Dom/sub roles or clear Dominance/submission)? What if both parties consider themselves to be asexual/nonsexual and do not engage in activities such as "punishment" but do individually engage in regression and partner parenting? What's your personal opinion? Can you see a different viewpoint than your own that could possibly make sense and also be "right"?